Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41899068›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2026

Fascial Plane Blocks for Analgesia in Non-Operating Room Anesthesia Settings.

Huseyin Ulas Pinar, Asina Pinar, Ayşe Heves Karagöz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Huseyin Ulas PinarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara 06230, Türkiye.
Asina PinarDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ankara Bilkent City Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Ankara 06800, Türkiye.
Ayşe Heves KaragözDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara 06230, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) has emerged as one of the fastest-growing domains of modern anesthetic practice. Increasing procedural complexity and an aging, comorbid patient population demand analgesic strategies that enhance safety, comfort, and procedural success while minimizing physiological disturbance. Although systemic opioids and sedatives remain commonly used in NORA settings, their dose-dependent adverse effects may compromise patient safety and delay recovery, particularly in environments with limited postprocedural monitoring. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks (FPBs) have therefore gained prominence as key components of opioid-sparing and opioid-free anesthetic strategies. By providing targeted regional analgesia with preserved hemodynamic stability, FPBs reduce systemic analgesic requirements and opioid-related side effects while improving patient comfort. This review summarizes the anatomical basis, proposed mechanisms of action, and current clinical evidence supporting the use of thoracic and abdominal fascial plane blocks in NORA settings, with particular emphasis on interventional cardiology and interventional radiology procedures. The expanding role of FPBs suggests that these techniques may become integral elements of standard analgesic protocols in contemporary non-operating room anesthesia practice.

Indexed as

fascial plane blocksinterventional cardiologyinterventional radiologynon-operating room anesthesiaopioid-sparing analgesiaregional anesthesia

Identifiers

PMID41899068
PMCPMC13026706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.