Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41898897›Full record

ReviewInsects2026

Eastern North American Monarch Butterfly Conservation Needs and Opportunities: What the Science Tells Us.

Karen S Oberhauser

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insects, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Karen S OberhauserDepartment of Entomology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Funding

Department of Defense Legacy Resource Management Program USFS Monarchs-23: DoD Legacy Program-23 A2205-097-012-022939 (HQ0642382383) / USFS 23-IA-11132762-151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monarch butterfly numbers in North America have been declining since the early 2000s. This review focuses on the causes of this decline in the eastern migratory population, found roughly east of the Rocky Mountains, and ways to achieve population sustainability. Drivers of eastern North American monarchs' decline include (1) the loss of breeding habitat, caused mainly by the loss of their milkweed host plants in agricultural fields after adoption of genetically modified, herbicide tolerant corn and soybeans, (2) weather, particularly warmer and drier conditions that could push monarchs farther north and lead to lower numbers, and (3) increasing insecticide use. Making habitat broadly available to monarchs across their migratory cycle will make them more resilient, and better able to survive weather-driven declines, and even small tracts of land can provide needed habitat. Sites that are isolated from other habitat patches contain higher egg, larva, and adult monarch densities. Good monarch habitat should include a diversity of native milkweed species and nectar plants that will thrive in local growing conditions. Monarch egg and larva density increases with increasing milkweed density and monarch survival is higher when larvae are less crowded, so a good general rule is that more milkweed is better.

Indexed as

conservation strategiesmonarch butterflypopulation drivers

Identifiers

PMID41898897
PMCPMC13027080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.