Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41898866›Full record

ArticleGenes2026

Bone Marrow as a Source of DNA in Forensic Genetics: An Optimized Nucleic Acids Extraction Protocol.

Mattia Porcu, Noemi Argirò, Venusia Cortellini, Antonio De Luca, Camilla Tettamanti, Lorenzo Franceschetti, Francesco Ventura, Andrea Verzeletti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mattia PorcuInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-1973-2993
Noemi ArgiròInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0005-4220-7266
Venusia CortelliniInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0096-9009
Antonio De LucaInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-1201-6002
Camilla TettamantiAzienda Sociosanitaria Ligure ASL3, 16121 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7410-3198
Lorenzo FranceschettiInstitute of Legal Medicine Milan, Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0887-0708
Francesco VenturaSection of Legal and Forensic Medicine, Department of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, 16132 Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8870-793X
Andrea VerzelettiInstitute of Legal Medicine, University of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6085-3249

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundlow-quantity or degraded samples are often studied in forensic genetics. Therefore, it is important to efficiently obtain all the available DNA from the biological sample analyzed to provide the most reliable results. This is particularly challenging in bone marrow processing due to its hydrophobic molecular structure, as for other lipid-rich tissues, especially if rancid. In fact, during adipose tissue decomposition, the putrefaction of fatty acids can in some instances give a compact cerous consistency to the lipidic tissue, hardly susceptible to the nucleic acid extraction mechanisms. According to environmental circumstances, this condition is notably observable in submerged bodies or in putrefied bone marrow. Thus, this study is focused on developing an optimized nucleic acids extraction protocol for putrefied bone marrow.

methodsgenetic analyses were performed on putrefied yellow bone marrow collected from 20 human femora recovered from bodies in different decomposition stages. The optimized method was developed by integrating additional steps, reagents and time intervals on a silica-based column commercial kit. This strategy was compared in DNA yield to a standard extraction protocol, represented by the same commercial kit, but following the manufacturer's directions. Both these strategies were tested in nucleic acid isolation efficiency by performing DNA typing, including real-time PCR quantification, Short Tandem Repeats (STR) amplification and fragments analysis steps. The analytical parameters evaluated were allele count, DNA concentration (ng/µL) and Degradation Index (DI).

resultsfor allele count and DNA concentration parameters, the optimized protocol showed clear and significant qualitative and quantitative improvements compared with the standard protocol, supporting its potential applicability in forensic casework and laying the foundation for future studies.

conclusionsprior to appropriate laboratory internal validation, the optimized protocol can be used for tough lipid-rich tissues processing without the need to purchase a dedicated system and using a same commercial kit routinely adopted for other forensic genetics matrices.

Indexed as

Bone MarrowDNAForensic GeneticsDNA FingerprintingHumansMicrosatellite RepeatsDNAadipose tissuebone marrowDNA extractionforensic geneticslipids putrefaction

Identifiers

PMID41898866
PMCPMC13026300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.