ArticleGenes2026
Bone Marrow as a Source of DNA in Forensic Genetics: An Optimized Nucleic Acids Extraction Protocol.
Article in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundlow-quantity or degraded samples are often studied in forensic genetics. Therefore, it is important to efficiently obtain all the available DNA from the biological sample analyzed to provide the most reliable results. This is particularly challenging in bone marrow processing due to its hydrophobic molecular structure, as for other lipid-rich tissues, especially if rancid. In fact, during adipose tissue decomposition, the putrefaction of fatty acids can in some instances give a compact cerous consistency to the lipidic tissue, hardly susceptible to the nucleic acid extraction mechanisms. According to environmental circumstances, this condition is notably observable in submerged bodies or in putrefied bone marrow. Thus, this study is focused on developing an optimized nucleic acids extraction protocol for putrefied bone marrow.
methodsgenetic analyses were performed on putrefied yellow bone marrow collected from 20 human femora recovered from bodies in different decomposition stages. The optimized method was developed by integrating additional steps, reagents and time intervals on a silica-based column commercial kit. This strategy was compared in DNA yield to a standard extraction protocol, represented by the same commercial kit, but following the manufacturer's directions. Both these strategies were tested in nucleic acid isolation efficiency by performing DNA typing, including real-time PCR quantification, Short Tandem Repeats (STR) amplification and fragments analysis steps. The analytical parameters evaluated were allele count, DNA concentration (ng/µL) and Degradation Index (DI).
resultsfor allele count and DNA concentration parameters, the optimized protocol showed clear and significant qualitative and quantitative improvements compared with the standard protocol, supporting its potential applicability in forensic casework and laying the foundation for future studies.
conclusionsprior to appropriate laboratory internal validation, the optimized protocol can be used for tough lipid-rich tissues processing without the need to purchase a dedicated system and using a same commercial kit routinely adopted for other forensic genetics matrices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.