ReviewGenes2026
Autosomal STR Markers for Forensic Genetics: Applications, Challenges, and Future Directions.
Review in Genes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Population Genetic Changes Associated with Long-Term African Swine Fever-Related Management in a Wild Boar (Genes · 2026Article
- Beyond the Core: The Role of Supplementary Short Tandem Repeats in Forensic Genetics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autosomal short tandem repeat (STR) markers remain the cornerstone of modern forensic genetics, providing exceptional power for individualization, kinship verification, and reconstruction of complex investigative cases. Over the last decade, the field has undergone a major technological transition from length-based capillary electrophoresis (CE) toward sequence-level characterization using massively parallel sequencing (MPS), enabling detection of internal sequence variants (isoalleles) and flanking-region polymorphisms that substantially increase discriminatory power in many forensic contexts. Although MPS is increasingly adopted in forensic laboratories, implementation remains dependent on infrastructure, cost considerations, validation requirements, and jurisdiction-specific legal frameworks. This review synthesizes the molecular mechanisms underlying STR variability, including replication slippage and mutation processes, and critically evaluates the transition to sequencing-based analysis. Particular attention is given to analytical challenges such as stochastic effects in ultra-low-template DNA and PCR inhibition in degraded samples. Special emphasis is placed on identification of skeletal remains from mass graves and historical contexts, where hierarchical analytical strategies-from mini-STR approaches to MPS-based workflows-enable recovery of highly fragmented DNA. The review also examines the evolution of probabilistic genotyping (PG), highlighting the importance of algorithmic transparency and reproducible analytical frameworks for judicial applications. By integrating technological advances with practical forensic challenges, this review outlines a comprehensive framework for implementing high-resolution STR analysis in contemporary genomic casework. As a narrative synthesis, the conclusions reflect currently available published evidence and acknowledge variability in validation status, implementation practices, and regional forensic infrastructures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.