ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Machine Learning Models for Sepsis: From Early Detection to Short- and Long-Term Prognosis.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sepsis is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, and its outcomes depend on early recognition and timely intervention. Conventional clinical scores and biomarkers provide prognostic value but often lack accuracy for individualized prediction. Machine learning (ML) offers the ability to integrate multidimensional data to improve risk stratification. We analyzed 477 patients admitted to our hospital, including 251 with sepsis, 100 with septic shock, and 126 controls. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected. Univariate correlation analyses explored associations with sepsis severity and mortality (in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day). Several ML models were tested, with performance assessed by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) and Matthews's correlation coefficient (MCC). Model interpretability was evaluated using SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations). Sepsis severity and mortality correlated with biomarkers (procalcitonin, mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin, lactate) and clinical scores (SOFA, qSOFA). In-hospital mortality was associated with ADM, catecholamine use, and SOFA, while 90-day mortality involved smoking and Gram-negative or polymicrobial infections. Different machine learning models were evaluated, and the model achieving the highest performance on the validation set was selected. The selected model either outperformed or demonstrated comparable performance to logistic regression, depending on the specific prediction task (AUC 0.99 for sepsis, 0.96 for septic shock, 0.70 for ICU admission; 0.90, 0.72, and 0.87 for in-hospital, 30-day, and 90-day mortality). SHAP confirmed the clinical relevance of these predictors. ML models integrating clinical and biochemical data outperform conventional methods in predicting sepsis progression and mortality, while maintaining interpretability. These findings support the use of ML-based tools for early diagnosis and personalized risk stratification in sepsis, though external validation is required before clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.