ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Circulating microRNAs as Early Biomarkers of Breast Cancer: A Nested Case-Control Study Within a Prospective Cohort in Italy.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating microRNAs (miRNAs) are promising minimally invasive biomarkers for cancer risk assessment, yet prospective evidence for breast cancer (BC) remains limited. We conducted a nested case-control study within a prospective cohort to examine whether pre-diagnostic circulating miRNAs are associated with subsequent BC risk and to explore their potential relevance in prospective population-based settings. Baseline serum from 160 women (80 incident BC cases; 80 matched controls) was analyzed, with a median time to diagnosis of 8.9 years. Eight candidate miRNAs were quantified by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) and normalized to miR-484. Group differences were evaluated by non-parametric tests, and odds ratios for BC were estimated using logistic regression models adjusted for established risk factors, with Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Cases and controls were comparable at baseline. Among the candidates, lower circulating miR-181 levels showed a suggestive inverse association with BC risk in fully adjusted models, while lower Let7 levels showed only a non-significant, hypothesis-generating inverse trend that did not survive Bonferroni correction. No other miRNA displayed clear associations with BC risk. These findings, while preliminary, support further large-scale prospective investigations specifically designed to assess predictive performance and external validation. employing standardized pre-analytical and analytical protocols, repeated sampling, and independent replication/external validation to clarify the etiologic relevance and potential risk-prediction value of circulating miRNAs for BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.