ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2026
Design and Testing of Root-Specific Synthetic Promoters by Machine Learning.
Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Methods in Forest Biotechnology: Current Status and Future Prospects.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic promoters are crucial for precise gene expression in transgenic plants, but their rational design is hindered by the difficulty in identifying functional cis-regulatory elements (CREs). In this study, we aimed to develop a systematic approach for discovering tissue-specific cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) and generating functional synthetic promoters in poplar. We performed extensive transcriptomic analysis across various poplar tissues to obtain categorical labels and detected motifs in all gene promoters using known transcription factor binding site (TFBS) position weight matrices. Informative, tissue-specific TFBSs were predicted using a random forest model. Applying this to a root-specific gene,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.