ReviewBiomedicines2026
En-Bloc Resection of Stage T4 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Direct Spinal Invasion: Technical Considerations and Comprehensive Literature Review.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Historically, stage T4 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with direct spinal invasion was considered a definitive surgical contraindication due to the perceived inability to achieve negative margins without catastrophic morbidity. This paradigm has shifted through the advancement of specialized surgical techniques, which facilitate radical en-bloc resection in highly selected candidates by adhering to the en-bloc concept. This concept mandates the retrieval of the tumor and invaded vertebral segments as a single, contiguous unit to prevent intralesional transgression and local recurrence. Achieving microscopic negative margins (R0) stands as the most critical prognostic factor, as radical resection offers a significantly improved potential for long-term survival. Technical success requires a meticulously planned multidisciplinary approach encompassing varied surgical corridors-ranging from combined anterior-posterior windows to single-stage posterior-only approaches-tailored to the tumor's anatomical level. Furthermore, preoperative hemostatic optimization using dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for vascular assessment and transarterial embolization (TAE) has become indispensable for managing the hypervascularity of the invaded vertebral bone. This review synthesizes these evolving strategies, illustrated by a case of a 74-year-old male with stage T4 NSCLC where an R0 resection was achieved through a two-stage approach integrating uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Ultimately, en-bloc management provides a feasible and potential surgical strategy toward long-term survival for localized, spine-invasive lung cancer within a multidisciplinary treatment framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.