ArticleBiomedicines2026
Redefining Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus Using AI-Driven Brain Volumetry.
Article in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a potentially reversible cause of gait disturbance and cognitive impairment in older adults, yet its diagnosis remains challenging and controversial. The core difficulty lies in distinguishing true hydrocephalus from ventricular enlargement secondary to cerebral atrophy or neurodegenerative disease, a distinction now recognized as non-binary. In many patients, ventricular enlargement reflects a continuum ranging from predominantly hydrocephalic iNPH to mixed pathological states combining impaired cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics and neurodegeneration. Conventional neuroradiological markers, including the Evans Index, the callosal angle, and the disproportionately enlarged subarachnoid-space hydrocephalus (DESH) pattern, provide useful qualitative guidance but are limited by their two-dimensional nature, interobserver variability, and poor sensitivity for differential diagnosis and outcome prediction. Over the past decade, advances in artificial intelligence-based brain volumetry (AI-BrV) have introduced a new paradigm for quantitative structural assessment. By enabling automated, anatomically precise, and reproducible three-dimensional quantification of ventricular and extraventricular CSF, cortical and subcortical gray matter, deep gray matter nuclei, and periventricular white matter, AI-BrV addresses many limitations of traditional imaging approaches. Beyond absolute volume measurements, AI-BrV enables the derivation of composite indices and ratios that may capture disease-specific structural phenotypes and better reflect the underlying pathophysiology of ventricular enlargement. Importantly, AI-BrV pipelines can be applied retrospectively to large legacy neuroimaging datasets and compared with extensive publicly available repositories, facilitating normative modeling, cross-disease analyses, and external validation of volumetric biomarkers. When integrated with clinical data and multivariable statistical or machine-learning frameworks, these approaches hold promise for improving patient selection, refining disease categorization, and supporting more rational decision-making regarding CSF diversion. In this context, AI-BrV offers a unifying framework for reconciling divergent clinical perspectives and advancing iNPH toward a more precise, reproducible, and evidence-based diagnostic and therapeutic paradigm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.