ReviewBiomedicines2026
Evaluating the Therapeutic Impact of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Management of Brain Metastases from Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Review in Biomedicines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients often develop brain metastases (BMs), with an incidence rate of 25-40%. These metastases are associated with a poor prognosis. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized NSCLC treatment, their effectiveness against BMs remains not well-established. This is primarily because patients with active or symptomatic BMs have frequently been excluded from clinical trials.
methodsTo address the lack of data, in this narrative review, we searched the available clinical guidelines and relevant studies. Databases, including PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science, were searched for clinical studies published up to June 2025. The article included studies of NSCLC patients with BMs who were treated with ICIs and had reported central nervous system (CNS)-specific outcomes.
resultsThis article found that ICIs show significant intracranial activity. This activity is particularly notable in select NSCLC patients with asymptomatic BMs and high Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.
conclusionsMore research is needed to fully understand the efficacy of ICIs in treating BMs. Future prospective studies must include patients with active and symptomatic BMs to validate these findings and provide a clearer picture of ICI efficacy in this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.