Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41898132›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

What Drives University Students' Sustained Participation in Volunteering? A Thematic Analysis from the Ecological Systems Theory (EST) Perspective.

Zhanni Luo, Xueqin Peng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhanni LuoSchool of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5162-875X
Xueqin PengSchool of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China.

Funding

Chongqing Social Science Planning Project 2025QM14
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnderstanding the drivers of sustained volunteering among university students is crucial, as their continued participation yields significant individual and societal benefits. However, a notable decline in participation underscores the need to investigate the factors that underpin and sustain volunteering motivation.

methodsUsing snowball sampling, 15 university students with volunteer experience were recruited for semi-structured interviews. A thematic analysis, guided by the Ecological Systems Theory (EST), was performed, with the mesosystem excluded from the analytical framework due to its indirect and less observable nature in participants' self-reports.

resultsBased on the interview responses, we identified 15 themes across the four systems (microsystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem) influencing university students' participation in volunteering. We further explored the restrictive factors that hinder their participation. To advance the analysis, we introduced a controllability framework ("controllable, partially controllable, minimally controllable") as an analytical lens. This framework emphasizes that while behaviors are shaped by various factors, behavior change can be most effectively promoted by focusing intervention efforts on those within the immediate control of the individual or relevant actors. IMPLICATIONS: This study demonstrates the EST's applicability to university students' volunteering research and provides practical insights for the design of volunteer programs.

Indexed as

Ecological Systems Theory (EST)thematic analysisvolunteeringvolunteer motivation

Identifiers

PMID41898132
PMCPMC13023804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.