ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Investigation of Pitch and Tone Preference of Preschool Children in Mandarin.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Child-directed speech (CDS) is characterized by a suite of exaggerated acoustic features, with elevated fundamental frequency (pitch) being a prominent and widely adopted component. While caregivers and educators frequently use high-pitch speech with young children, its perceptual preference among preschool-aged children, particularly in tonal languages like Mandarin, remains empirically unclear. This study aimed to investigate Mandarin-speaking preschoolers' explicit preferences for manipulated pitch levels at the sentence frame while also examining the potential influence of lexical tone. Ninety-four children aged 3-6 years completed a binary forced-choice preference task. They listened to sentences systematically varying in three pitch levels (high, normal, low F
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.