ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Temporal Probability-Guided Shifts in Temporal Preparation Away from the Beat Under a Distracting Rhythm in Aging.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Temporal preparation has been consistently shown to be driven by regular rhythms, which are commonly considered to automatically attract attentional resources to on-beat moments, facilitating behavioral performance relative to off-beat moments in both younger and older adults. However, when targets occur more often at off-beat moments such that the rhythm becomes task-disadvantageous, it remains unclear whether older adults can adjust preparatory resources away from on-beat moments and toward the high-probability time point. To address this issue, younger and older adults completed a temporal preparation task at fast (800 ms) and slow (2000 ms) tempos under three conditions: attend-on-beat (rhythmic sequence; 80% on-beat targets), attend-off-beat (rhythmic sequence; 80% off-beat targets), and random (nonrhythmic sequence; 50% each). The results showed that, relative to the random condition, both age groups responded faster at the instructed high-probability time point in both rhythmic conditions, even when it fell off-beat, indicating that temporal probabilities can guide temporal preparation away from a task-disadvantageous on-beat moment toward the task-relevant time point. Moreover, this pattern was observed under both the fast and slow tempos. Together, these findings suggest that older adults preserve the ability to use temporal probabilities to reduce rhythmic distraction across sub-second and supra-second time scales.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.