Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41898108›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Gender Beliefs in the Kitchen: A Qualitative Exploration of Safe Food Handling Behaviours in Australia.

Nicolas La Verghetta, Matthew Phillips, Chloe Maxwell-Smith, Barbara Mullan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nicolas La VerghettaSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-3123-4600
Matthew PhillipsSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7908-5868
Chloe Maxwell-SmithSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1694-2732
Barbara MullanSchool of Population Health, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0177-8899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foodborne illness remains a persistent public health issue, yet domestic food safety practices are shaped by individual knowledge, social expectations, and gendered norms. This study examines how gender norms and expectations shape Australian consumers' safe food-handling knowledge, perceptions, and practices. Guided by a social constructionist epistemology and feminist framework, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 28 participants aged 18-24 years recruited from a university research participation pool. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Three themes were identified: "I know what I am doing", optimism bias and false confidence, "Men's casualness versus women's strictness", gendered safe food handling practices and expectations, and "Careful about others, relaxed for myself", food safety as a social performance. Participants often expressed false confidence in their practices, reflecting optimism bias and reduced perceived susceptibility to foodborne illness. Women tended to portray vigilance and responsibility, while men described more relaxed approaches, reflecting gendered socialisation. Food safety also emerged as performative, with heightened care displayed when cooking for others. These findings highlight that domestic food safety is socially embedded and both reflects and reproduces gender norms. Addressing these dynamics through socially informed, context-sensitive interventions may improve public health outcomes.

Indexed as

gender normsreflexive thematic analysisrisk perceptionsafe food handling

Identifiers

PMID41898108
PMCPMC13024013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.