ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
The Influence of Varying Degrees of Enactability on the Enactment Effect in Action Memory During the Encoding and Retrieval Stages: A Study with Healthy Young Adults.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whether the enactment effect benefits from motor information activation is a key concern in action memory; meanwhile, the degree of enactability may influence this activation. Accordingly, this study aims to examine the explanatory role of motor information reactivation in the enactment effect and to further clarify whether a certain degree of motor information activation is necessary for this effect to emerge. To this end, we manipulated the degree of enactability and separately investigated its impact on the enactment effect at the encoding stage (Experiment 1) and the retrieval stage (Experiment 2). Experiment 1 required participants to either silently read phrases or both silently read and physically enact the actions represented by the phrases during encoding. The research showed that an enactment effect was only observed for the high-enactability-phrases condition, but not for the low-enactability-phrases condition. Experiment 2 additionally required participants to either verbally recall (verbal retrieval) or verbally recall while simultaneously performing corresponding actions (enactment retrieval) during retrieval. The findings showed that under the verbal retrieval condition, the enactment effect was observed for the high-enactability-phrases condition but not for the low-enactability-phrases condition; under the enactment retrieval condition, the enactment effect was observed both for the high-enactability phrases and low-enactability-phrases conditions. Thus, motor information activation during encoding and retrieval is crucial for the enactment effect, which emerges only when motor information activation reaches a threshold, supporting and expanding motor information reactivation theory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.