Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41898095›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

From Self-Esteem to Symptoms: A Potential Role for Difficulties Accessing Internal States and Body-Checking Behavior in Disordered Eating Patterns.

Diana Arbich, Daniela Kaplan, Reuven Dar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Diana ArbichThe School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.
Daniela KaplanThe School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.ORCID 0009-0003-8767-084X
Reuven DarThe School of Psychological Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-2178-0483

Funding

Israel Science Foundation 1279/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drawing on the Seeking Proxies for Internal States (SPIS) model and the concept of Difficulties in Accessing Internal States (DAIS), the present study examined the statistical associations among self-esteem, DAIS, body-checking, and disordered eating patterns (DEP). Within the SPIS framework, self-esteem is conceptualized as an evaluative internal state that may be appraised through externally observable proxies, such as body appearance. Cross-sectional data were collected from 200 adults recruited through Prolific Academic. Hayes' PROCESS macro was used to test simple and serial mediation models examining whether DAIS and body-checking statistically account for associations between state self-esteem and DEP. Lower self-esteem was associated with higher DEP. Both DAIS and body-checking statistically accounted for portions of this association in simple mediation models. In a serial mediation model, the fully sequential pathway (self-esteem → DAIS → body-checking → DEP) remained statistically significant after accounting for shared variance among mediators. Given the cross-sectional design, these findings cannot establish temporal or causal relationships, but the observed pattern of associations is compatible with the proposed conceptual process. Additionally, our findings are based on a nonclinical sample and reflect variability in subclinical eating pathology. Implications for extending the SPIS framework to dimensional eating-related phenomena are discussed.

Indexed as

body-checkingbody imagedisordered eating patternseating disordersinternal statesmediationproxiesself-esteem

Identifiers

PMID41898095
PMCPMC13024392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.