Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41898093›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Effects of the AMPPS One-on-One Mathematics Intervention on Students' Complex Computation, Word-Problem Solving, and Math Self-Concept.

Natasha K Newson, John C Begeny, Felicia L Davidson, Robin S Codding, Kourtney R Kromminga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natasha K NewsonDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
John C BegenyDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8006-5928
Felicia L DavidsonDepartment of Psychology, College of Humanities and Social Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.
Robin S CoddingDepartment of Applied Psychology, Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6717-0790
Kourtney R KrommingaSchool of Psychology, College of Education and Human Sciences, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS 39406, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite consensus in the mathematics education literature regarding the mutually dependent components of math proficiency, as well as the importance of their development, most elementary-aged students in the United States demonstrate a lack of proficiency in math according to national assessment data. Whole number knowledge, which includes skills in computation and word-problem solving, is understood to be a critical foundation for the development of later math skills. This study used a multiple-baseline experimental design to evaluate the impacts of an evidence-based mathematics intervention, Accelerating Mathematics Performance with Practice Strategies (AMPPS), on third- through fifth-grade students' skills with complex computation, as well as on their word-problem-solving performance. Furthermore, we evaluated effects on students' math self-concept. Five students identified to have difficulties in math received AMPPS in a one-on-one, in-person format. The results of the study were mixed. For example, when using visual analyses as our primary analytic method, these analyses did not show robust intervention effects on students' computation skills but did show at least some improvement for most students' word-problem-solving skills. Additionally, supplemental analyses comparing student growth to national and school-based norms suggested that all participants seemed to benefit from the intervention, but these analyses were not intended to examine experimental causality. Despite study limitations and a lower than optimal number of AMPPS sessions (dosage) provided to students, the present study offers several directions for future research, as well as possible implications for practitioners regarding intervention selection, intensity, and evaluation. The findings will also be discussed in the context of conducting systematic replication studies, which are essential for understanding the generality of a given phenomenon (e.g., an effect of a school-based intervention) across a wide range of situations and conditions.

Indexed as

computationdosageinterventionmathematicsmath fluencymath self-conceptword-problem solving

Identifiers

PMID41898093
PMCPMC13023573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.