ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
AI Self-Efficacy and Innovative Work Behavior in Hospitality and Tourism: A Job Demands-Resources Perspective on Work Engagement and Schedule I-Deals.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As artificial intelligence becomes increasingly embedded in hospitality and tourism services, it is reshaping employees' innovative work behavior. Grounded in the Job Demands-Resources perspective, this study examines how AI self-efficacy affects innovative work behavior and proposes a moderated mediation model to investigate the mediating role of work engagement and the boundary condition of schedule idiosyncratic deals. Using a three-wave time-lagged design, the study collected data from 300 employees working in the hospitality and tourism industry in Korea. The findings show that AI self-efficacy positively predicts innovative work behavior both directly and indirectly through increased work engagement. Furthermore, this mediating process is strengthened by higher levels of schedule i-deals, confirming a positive moderating effect. Theoretically, this study extends human-AI collaboration research by broadening the explanatory scope of the Job Demands-Resources model in the AI context. Practically, organizations undergoing digital transformation should provide training that strengthens employees' confidence in using AI and grant greater autonomy over work schedules. Such practices help create a supportive environment that enables AI self-efficacy to translate into work engagement and ultimately innovative work behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.