Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41898081›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Misconceptions on Grief and Bereaved People's Needs Among Health and Social Care Professionals, Teachers and General Population in Italy.

Claudia Venuleo, Simone Rollo, Daniela Nogueira

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Claudia VenuleoDepartment of Human and Social Sciences, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2500-1766
Simone RolloDepartment of Humanities, University of Foggia, 71121 Foggia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7873-9348
Daniela NogueiraDepartment of Behavioral and Social Sciences, ISMAI-Instituto Universitário da Maia, Porto District, 4425 Maia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3870-1748

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated misconceptions about grief among health and social workers, teachers, and the general population in Italy. Socio-demographic characteristics, including gender, age, education, and personal experience of loss, were also examined. A questionnaire with nine statements capturing common myths about grief and its management was completed by 233 participants (mean age = 42.2, SD = 12.7; 60.9% women) using a 4-point Likert scale. Results showed that most participants responded inaccurately to most statements, agreeing with the idea that grief proceeds in a linear fashion, overlooking the heterogeneity of grief reactions, pathologizing them, and overestimating the need for psychological support. Health and social workers provided more accurate responses than teachers and the general population for certain myths, particularly regarding grief in children and older adults. Significant differences were also observed for some myths in relation to gender and whether participants had experienced a significant loss. These findings highlight the widespread endorsement of grief-related misconceptions and the compelling need to improve public awareness of the grieving process. They provide valuable insights into the key topics that should be addressed when designing initiatives to enhance community competence in supporting bereaved individuals.

Indexed as

general populationgriefhealth and social care professionalsmythsteacherstraining needs

Identifiers

PMID41898081
PMCPMC13024620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.