A Nation Veering off Course: Implications for Efficacy and Well-Being.

Kristina G Chamberlin, J Doris Dai, Hannah F Ramil, Laura M Brady, Stephanie A Fryberg

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristina G ChamberlinDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0501-3252

J Doris DaiDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3554-2849

Hannah F RamilDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.ORCID 0009-0002-1974-2971

Laura M BradyIndependent Researcher, Chicago, IL 60606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5097-7122

Stephanie A FrybergDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3627-3687

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States has undergone rapid and, at times, unprecedented political changes in 2025. Recent national polling indicates that many Americans-across political parties-believe that the country is heading in the wrong direction. In a preregistered study with more than 7000 adults residing in the United States, we explored the implications of these widespread concerns for individuals' psychological functioning. As theorized, individuals who believed that the political climate was worsening and viewed the United States as failing to live up to its core national values experienced lower efficacy, both in terms of their personal ability to influence politics (i.e., individual efficacy) and their confidence in the government to uphold its obligations to the nation and its residents (i.e., government efficacy). In turn, these individuals reported worse overall well-being and less effective coping in response to stressors related to the political climate. These relationships persisted after accounting for the participants' 2024 presidential vote choice and political party affiliation. Together, these findings suggest that the political turbulence Americans are experiencing exerts a measurable, bipartisan toll on Americans' psychological and social health.

Indexed as

COPEcopingefficacynational valuesPERMApolitical climatewell-being

Identifiers

PMID41898067

DOI10.3390/bs16030405

PMCPMC13023781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.