ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Leveraging Distance-Based Effectiveness Indicators for Enhanced Behavioral Pattern Discovery in Complex Problem-Solving Assessment.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Data-driven approaches have emerged as powerful tools for analyzing process data. This study focuses on two data-driven methods: n-gram chi-square feature selection for extracting key action segments and K-medoids clustering combined with Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) distance for identifying behavioral patterns. To address the limitations that arise when applying these methods to complex tasks where ambiguous raw actions often hinder interpretation, this study introduces distance-based effectiveness indicators to enhance both data-driven methods for analyzing actions in the context of complex problem-solving. The research examines how representing action sequences through state effectiveness (ds) and transition effectiveness (Δds→s') indicators outperforms the use of raw actions alone within the complex collaborative problem-solving Balance Beam task. Results consistently demonstrated that effectiveness indicators significantly improved the sensitivity of n-gram feature selection, the performance of clustering, and the interpretability of both n-grams and resulting clusters. Specifically, state effectiveness representations (ds→ds') yielded the best outcomes. These findings advocate for the integration of effectiveness indicators into data-driven process analytics to more effectively capture and explain behavioral patterns of problem-solving.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.