ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Promoting Holistic Student Development Through Universal School-Based Social-Emotional Learning in China: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Social-emotional learning (SEL) is a crucial pathway for cultivating students' social-emotional skills and promoting their holistic development. This study presents the first meta-analysis of universal school-based SEL interventions implemented in the PreK-12 educational context of mainland China. Based on 52 studies involving 13,969 students, the analysis reveals a significant, medium overall effect (ES = 0.56), demonstrating the positive impact of school-based SEL programs on Chinese students' development. However, given that the majority of included studies employed quasi-experimental designs with relatively small sample sizes, this effect should be interpreted as primarily reflecting efficacy under controlled conditions rather than effectiveness in real-world implementation contexts. Outcomes vary by domain, with the strongest effects observed in social-emotional skills (ES = 0.63), followed by academic performance (ES = 0.34), behaviors (ES = 0.31), and affect and attitudes (ES = 0.24). Moderator analyses further reveal that sample size, intervention dosage, implementer, and grade level significantly influenced effect sizes, whereas publication type, duration, source of outcome data, and intervention approach did not. Cross-cultural comparisons further contextualize these findings within the international SEL literature. By establishing an initial evidence base, this review highlights the promise of school-based SEL in China, while also noting limitations in external and ecological validity. Future research should prioritize more large-scale RCTs, focus on the quality of implementation, and address the needs of marginalized student groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.