Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41898028›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Rethinking Recovery: Psychological Flexibility and Growth Across Diverse Recovery Approaches.

Nicole M Pyke, David R Perkins, Emily K Sandoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nicole M PykeDepartment of Psychology, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA.ORCID 0009-0006-3815-6213
David R PerkinsDepartment of Psychology, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70503, USA.
Emily K SandozUniversity Honors Program, University of Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70503, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1442-7764

Funding

Louisiana Board of Regents via the Emma Louise LeBlanc Burguieres/BORSF Endowed Professorship of Social Sciences NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although recovery capital and psychological flexibility have each been associated with substance use recovery, their combined role in fostering posttraumatic growth remains unclear. This study integrates recovery capital theory with psychological flexibility and posttraumatic growth frameworks to test a theory-driven model of adaptive recovery processes. The study sought to (1) examine whether recovery capital or abstinence predicts posttraumatic growth, (2) assess whether recovery capital or abstinence status predicts psychological flexibility, and (3) test whether psychological flexibility statistically mediates the relationship between recovery and posttraumatic growth. A national sample of 244 adults in recovery from substance use disorder completed the Assessment of Recovery Capital, the Personalized Psychological Flexibility Index, and the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory-Expanded. Multiple linear regressions addressed the first two aims. For Aim 3, the mediation model was tested using the SPSS PROCESS macro (version 4.0) with 5000 bootstrap resamples. Recovery capital significantly predicted both posttraumatic growth and psychological flexibility. Abstinence status did not predict posttraumatic or psychological flexibility. Psychological flexibility partially mediated the association between recovery capital and posttraumatic growth. Psychological flexibility may be a key mechanism by which recovery capital fosters posttraumatic growth, supporting interventions that enhance both resources beyond abstinence alone.

Indexed as

abstinenceposttraumatic growthpsychological flexibilityrecovery capitalsubstance use recoverytrauma

Identifiers

PMID41898028
PMCPMC13024174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.