Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41897995›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Differences in the Processing of Chinese Transitive and Intransitive Verbs at the Behavioral Response and Neural Activity Levels.

Xin Wang, Dandan Liang, Yiming Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xin WangSchool of Humanities and Arts, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China.
Dandan LiangSchool of Liberal Arts, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China.
Yiming YangSchool of Linguistic Sciences and Arts, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221009, China.

Funding

China National Social Sciences Funding 23AYY013China National Social Sciences Funding 25BYY085Jiangsu Major Research Projects in Philosophy and Social Sciences at Higher Education Institutions 2023SJZD110Jiangsu Social Sciences Funding 24YYC009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Chinese, intransitive verbs can take direct objects in certain constructions, and transitive verbs can also be used without objects. These characteristics have long sparked debates about whether verbs can be divided into intransitive and transitive verbs in Chinese. Using E-Prime software (3.0 version) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) technology, we investigated the behavioral responses and neural activities of native speakers when processing Chinese intransitive and transitive verbs. Behavioral data showed that the accuracy rate for Chinese intransitive verbs was significantly higher than that for transitive verbs, while the reaction time was significantly shorter. fMRI data revealed that compared with Chinese intransitive verbs, transitive verbs elicited significantly stronger activation in brain regions such as the bilateral angular gyri (BA39), left supramarginal gyrus (BA40), and left inferior frontal gyrus (BA44). The bilateral angular gyri and left supramarginal gyrus may be associated with more intricate argument semantic representation of the Chinese transitive verb, while the left inferior frontal gyrus may reflect their more complex syntactic structure representation. The above experimental results indicate that processing Chinese transitive verbs requires greater cognitive effort and involves more complex neural activities compared to intransitive verbs, which demonstrates that verbs in Chinese should be subdivided into intransitive and transitive verbs.

Indexed as

accuracy ratebilateral angular gyriChineseintransitive verbleft inferior frontal gyrusleft supramarginal gyrusreaction timetransitive verb

Identifiers

PMID41897995
PMCPMC13023479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.