ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Retrospective Analysis of Triage and Hospitalisation Records for Bushfire-Affected Koalas (
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Following bushfires (also known as wildfires), impacted free-living wildlife with welfare or conservation concerns are captured and presented for veterinary assessment where possible. This study represents an in-depth retrospective analysis of the veterinary records of 259 animals in Victoria, Australia, impacted by bushfire in 2019-2020. In total, 35 different species were assessed, including 196 koalas. Multivariable analyses of 126 koalas with complete medical records identified several clinical prognostic factors affecting 6-month survival outcomes. Increased odds of negative outcomes (death or euthanasia) were associated with increasing age (tooth wear class; odds ratio 2.70 for one unit increase), lower body condition score (one-unit decrease OR 7.27), and the earlier animals were presented after the fire event (OR 0.94 for each passing day). In 83 koalas with burn injuries, negative outcomes were also associated with burns more severe than minor (85% survival for minor burns only, compared to 31% survival with moderate or severe burns), and burns to more than 10 digits (12% survival). In burnt koalas, the combination of burn severity and digital involvement appear to be important prognostic factors for long-term outcomes. These findings can support veterinarians to more accurately evaluate prognosis for bushfire-affected koalas during initial assessment and will facilitate the strategic allocation of limited treatment and rehabilitation resources to the animals most likely to recover. The scope of this study was limited to the consideration of health outcomes, with the recognition of health as just one of many factors that must inform decisions about rehabilitating injured wildlife.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.