ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026
Studies on the Possibility of Introducing New Materials into Reproductive Biotechnology and a New Type of Catheter for Embryo Transfer.
Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The use of seven biomaterials was examined in the study: polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyurethane (PU), teflon (PTFE), polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactide (PLLA), and a copolymer of poly L-lactide and dibutyryl chitin (PLLA/DBC). The use of these materials has not been discussed in the context of animal reproduction so far. Due to the specific nature of the reproductive system and the high sensitivity of reproductive cells, at the outset the biocompatibility and cytotoxicity of the materials were tested in somatic cell and embryo cultures. Additionally, the material properties of the catheters were determined in terms of the roughness of the internal and external surfaces, the stability of the shape of the catheters, their elasticity, durability, and ductility. Finally, clinical testing of the developed catheters was performed in laparoscopic transplantation of embryos into the uterine tubes of the sows. Significant toxicity of PTFE, PCL and PLLA/DBC towards the embryos was indicated in the cytotoxicity testing. In the materials testing, numerous flaws of the PP, PLLA, and PLLA/DBC catheters were indicated. In the final stage, catheters were developed using PE and PU. In clinical testing, these latter catheters exhibited high effectiveness in transferring embryos. Among the seven biomaterials tested, only polyethylene and polyurethane exhibited high biocompatibility and the material properties mentioned above. There is thus good indication for the introduction of these catheters for embryo transfer in animal reproduction biotechnology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.