Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41897883›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2026

Studies on the Possibility of Introducing New Materials into Reproductive Biotechnology and a New Type of Catheter for Embryo Transfer.

Jarosław Wieczorek, Ewa Stodolak-Zych, Krzysztof Okoń, Jurij Koseniuk, Magdalena Bryła, Małgorzata Kotula-Balak, Jacek Jura, Katarzyna Poniedziałek-Kempny, Iwona Rajska, Katarzyna Soból and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jarosław WieczorekFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-5579-4870
Ewa Stodolak-ZychDepartment of Biomaterials, Faculty of Materials Science and Ceramics, University of Science and Technology, Mickiewicza 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-8935-4811
Krzysztof OkońChair of Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum, Jagiellonian University, Grzegorzecka 16, 30-526 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1921-5007
Jurij KoseniukArtvimed Centre for Reproductive Medicine, IVF Laboratory Czyzowka 14, 30-526 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5479-2176
Magdalena BryłaDepartment of Reproductive Biotechnology and Cryoconservation, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 30-322 Krakow, Poland.
Małgorzata Kotula-BalakFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6379-996X
Jacek JuraDepartment of Reproductive Biotechnology and Cryoconservation, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 30-322 Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna Poniedziałek-KempnyDepartment of Pig Breeding, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 30-322 Krakow, Poland.
Iwona RajskaDepartment of Animal Molecular Biology, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 30-322 Krakow, Poland.
Katarzyna SobólDepartment of Reproductive Biotechnology and Cryoconservation, National Research Institute of Animal Production, Krakowska 1, 30-322 Krakow, Poland.
Aleksandra Lasoń-KubarekPodgorskie Veterinary Center, Na Dolach 6, 30-704 Krakow, Poland.
Izabela KrakowskaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.
Grzegorz FraśFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.

Funding

The Polish Ministry of Education and Science and The National Research Institute of Animal Production in Krakow, Poland No. N302 632140 and No. 02-6.01.1.03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of seven biomaterials was examined in the study: polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyurethane (PU), teflon (PTFE), polycaprolactone (PCL), polylactide (PLLA), and a copolymer of poly L-lactide and dibutyryl chitin (PLLA/DBC). The use of these materials has not been discussed in the context of animal reproduction so far. Due to the specific nature of the reproductive system and the high sensitivity of reproductive cells, at the outset the biocompatibility and cytotoxicity of the materials were tested in somatic cell and embryo cultures. Additionally, the material properties of the catheters were determined in terms of the roughness of the internal and external surfaces, the stability of the shape of the catheters, their elasticity, durability, and ductility. Finally, clinical testing of the developed catheters was performed in laparoscopic transplantation of embryos into the uterine tubes of the sows. Significant toxicity of PTFE, PCL and PLLA/DBC towards the embryos was indicated in the cytotoxicity testing. In the materials testing, numerous flaws of the PP, PLLA, and PLLA/DBC catheters were indicated. In the final stage, catheters were developed using PE and PU. In clinical testing, these latter catheters exhibited high effectiveness in transferring embryos. Among the seven biomaterials tested, only polyethylene and polyurethane exhibited high biocompatibility and the material properties mentioned above. There is thus good indication for the introduction of these catheters for embryo transfer in animal reproduction biotechnology.

Indexed as

biomaterialcatheterembryostransfer

Identifiers

PMID41897883
PMCPMC13023243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.