ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Understanding Acceptance of Genome-Edited Crops and Foods: The Role of Trust, Attitudes, and Perceived Literacy in Italy.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-editing (GE) techniques are gaining relevance in the agri-food system for their potential to enhance crop resilience and sustainability, raising questions about consumer acceptance and responsible innovation. Understanding public willingness to buy (WTB) GE foods is therefore essential. While trust in science is often cited as a key driver, its effects are not straightforward. This study examines mechanisms linking trust in science to WTB GE foods, testing the mediating role of attitudes and the moderating role of perceived literacy. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a representative sample of Italian adults. Using structural equation modelling, we tested three models: a mediation model, a model including a direct path between trust and WTB, and a moderated model incorporating perceived literacy. Trust predicted more favourable attitudes toward GE, and attitudes were strongly associated with WTB. However, when controlling for attitudes, the direct effect of trust on WTB was negative. Perceived literacy significantly moderated this relationship: higher perceived literacy strengthened the negative trust-WTB association. Overall, generalized trust in science is not sufficient for public acceptance of GE crops and foods. Communication strategies should move beyond trust-building and foster informed, critically engaged consumers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.