Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41897728›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Understanding Acceptance of Genome-Edited Crops and Foods: The Role of Trust, Attitudes, and Perceived Literacy in Italy.

Michele Paleologo, Alessandra Lanubile, Marco Camardo Leggieri, Paolo Gomarasca, Guendalina Graffigna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Michele PaleologoDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, L.go Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8075-2450
Alessandra LanubileDepartment of Sustainable Crop Production, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1868-4469
Marco Camardo LeggieriDepartment of Sustainable Crop Production, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Via Emilia Parmense 84, 29122 Piacenza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6547-7702
Paolo GomarascaDepartment of Philosophy, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, L.go Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0539-9423
Guendalina GraffignaDepartment of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, L.go Gemelli 1, 20123 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4378-7467

Funding

Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore D.3.2./2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-editing (GE) techniques are gaining relevance in the agri-food system for their potential to enhance crop resilience and sustainability, raising questions about consumer acceptance and responsible innovation. Understanding public willingness to buy (WTB) GE foods is therefore essential. While trust in science is often cited as a key driver, its effects are not straightforward. This study examines mechanisms linking trust in science to WTB GE foods, testing the mediating role of attitudes and the moderating role of perceived literacy. A cross-sectional online survey was conducted with a representative sample of Italian adults. Using structural equation modelling, we tested three models: a mediation model, a model including a direct path between trust and WTB, and a moderated model incorporating perceived literacy. Trust predicted more favourable attitudes toward GE, and attitudes were strongly associated with WTB. However, when controlling for attitudes, the direct effect of trust on WTB was negative. Perceived literacy significantly moderated this relationship: higher perceived literacy strengthened the negative trust-WTB association. Overall, generalized trust in science is not sufficient for public acceptance of GE crops and foods. Communication strategies should move beyond trust-building and foster informed, critically engaged consumers.

Indexed as

attitudesfood acceptancegenome editingperceived literacytrust in sciencewillingness to buy

Identifiers

PMID41897728
PMCPMC13024929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.