ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Sectoral Analysis of Food Waste in EU Countries: Implications for Pro-Environmental Orientation and Policy.
Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Food waste remains a critical sustainability challenge for the European Union (EU), with significant negative impacts on environmental resources, economic efficiency, and social equity. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of food waste across EU member states during the 2020-2023 period, examining waste generation across five key sectors: households, food service (restaurants and catering), retail, food manufacturing, and primary agriculture. The study uses Eurostat statistical data, standardising measurements to kilograms per capita and absolute tonnage to enable cross-country comparisons. Particular attention is devoted to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, which disproportionately affected the service and retail sectors. Beyond descriptive analysis, the research investigates potential relationships between major economic indicators (Gross Domestic Product [GDP], median income, and material deprivation) and food waste rates, employing Kruskal-Wallis statistical tests to examine sectoral and cross-national patterns. Contrary to conventional assumptions, analyses reveal no statistically significant direct correlation between economic prosperity and waste generation, suggesting that institutional design, infrastructure availability, consumer awareness, and education exert greater determinative influence than aggregate wealth. Results demonstrate that households are the largest source of food waste across the EU, accounting for approximately 50% of food waste. At the same time, sectoral variations reflect country-specific structural and regulatory factors rather than levels of economic development. The research concludes with actionable policy recommendations targeting three intervention levels: individual behaviour change (consumer education, digital tools, and purchase planning), community infrastructure (food redistribution networks and collective composting), and institutional reform (regulatory harmonisation, circular economy incentives, and extended producer responsibility). These recommendations align with EU strategic priorities, including the European Green Deal, Farm to Fork Strategy, and 2030 Circular Economy Action Plan, with the specific objective of halving food waste by 2030 to enhance both environmental sustainability and food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.