Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41897693›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Conventional Chromatographic Techniques and Biosensors for Mercury Speciation in Seafood: A Systematic Review.

Doaa Abouelenein, Miguel Henares, Ana Fuentes, Isabel Fernández-Segovia, José M Barat, Katrin Loeschner, Lene Duedahl-Olesen, Maribel Gómez-Gómez, Amadeu Griol, Jens J Sloth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Doaa AboueleneinResearch Group for Analytical Food Chemistry, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Henrik Dams Allé B202, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark.
Miguel HenaresUniversity Institute of Food Engineering-FoodUPV, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Ana FuentesUniversity Institute of Food Engineering-FoodUPV, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4144-2396
Isabel Fernández-SegoviaUniversity Institute of Food Engineering-FoodUPV, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
José M BaratUniversity Institute of Food Engineering-FoodUPV, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-8487-7114
Katrin LoeschnerResearch Group for Analytical Food Chemistry, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Henrik Dams Allé B202, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1741-8406
Lene Duedahl-OlesenResearch Group for Analytical Food Chemistry, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Henrik Dams Allé B202, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3162-0101
Maribel Gómez-GómezNanophotonics Technology Center, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7548-209X
Amadeu GriolNanophotonics Technology Center, Universitat Politècnica de València, Camino de Vera s/n, 46022 Valencia, Spain.
Jens J SlothResearch Group for Analytical Food Chemistry, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), Henrik Dams Allé B202, DK-2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3636-8769

Funding

European Union's HORIZON-CL4-2022 101093042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mercury (Hg) is of significant concern due to its toxicity, which strongly depends on its chemical forms, and organic mercury compounds, particularly methylmercury (MeHg), are considered the most toxic species. Therefore, mercury speciation analysis is essential for accurate exposure and risk assessment. The primary dietary source of mercury exposure for humans is food consumption, particularly seafood. Consequently, numerous studies have focused on developing analytical techniques for the identification, characterization, and quantification of Hg species in seafood. This review evaluates and compares recent developments (2014-2025) in analytical techniques for the identification and quantification of Hg species in seafood, focusing on both traditional chromatographic methods and emerging methodologies based on biosensors. Hyphenated techniques such as HPLC-ICP-MS and GC-ICP-MS have enabled significant advancements in mercury speciation analysis. Although chromatographic methods are highly effective and widely accepted due to their accuracy and sensitivity, they often require costly instrumentation, skilled operators, and lengthy analysis times. Biosensors are increasingly proposed as alternatives; however, their applicability to seafood analysis remains limited despite advantages such as portability, simplicity, and rapid response. They are still under development and face challenges in selectivity, stability, and standardization. This review provides an overview of existing methodologies, comparing their advantages and limitations, aiming to guide improvements toward optimal methods incorporating all advantageous features.

Indexed as

analytical methodsbiosensorsfood safetyhyphenated techniquesmercury speciesmethylmercury

Identifiers

PMID41897693
PMCPMC13024865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.