Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41897673›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Brachial Artery Pseudoaneurysm as a Complication of Osteochondral Exostosis of the Humerus in Computed Tomography Angiography Images.

Paweł Gać, Michał Wesołowski, Kamil Biedka, Rafał Poręba

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Paweł GaćDepartment of Environmental Health, Occupational Medicine and Epidemiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-345 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8366-0239
Michał WesołowskiCentre for Diagnostic Imaging, 4th Military Hospital, 50-981 Wroclaw, Poland.
Kamil BiedkaCentre for Diagnostic Imaging, 4th Military Hospital, 50-981 Wroclaw, Poland.
Rafał PorębaCentre for Diagnostic Imaging, 4th Military Hospital, 50-981 Wroclaw, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present computed tomography angiography images of a rare pseudoaneurysm of the left brachial artery, a complication of idiopathic injury to the artery caused by an osteochondral exostosis of the left humerus. A 22-year-old Caucasian man with no significant medical history was admitted to the emergency department due to sudden, intense pain in his left arm, numbness, and pallor of his left forearm and hand. The patient's consulting vascular surgeon referred him to the computed tomography (CT) laboratory for a computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the arteries of his left upper limb. In the CTA examination, at the level of the proximal segment of the left brachial artery, an excess of contrast was visualized, measuring up to approximately 1.5 × 1.2 cm in cross-sections and up to approximately 0.7 cm in the craniocaudal dimension. The CTA image was suggestive of a pseudoaneurysm of the left brachial artery. Laterally, the pseudoaneurysm was adjacent to the apex of the imaged osteochondral exostosis on the medial surface of the proximal shaft of the left humerus. A surgical procedure was performed to repair the pseudoaneurysm of the left brachial artery, including removal of the bony exostosis of the left humerus. In summary, relatively common, benign bone lesions can occasionally result in serious vascular complications. CTA is the gold standard for diagnosing these complications.

Indexed as

brachial arterycomputed tomography angiographyhumerusosteochondromapseudoaneurysm

Identifiers

PMID41897673
PMCPMC13025556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.