ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Myasthenia Gravis in Pregnancy: Prenatal and Postnatal Diagnostic Challenges-A Narrative Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a prevalent autoimmune disorder affecting neuromuscular junctions, typically characterized by muscle weakness due to autoantibodies targeting acetylcholine receptors (AChR) or muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). Generalized MG is a more severe form of the condition than ocular MG. Although MG can strike at any age, young adult women are typically affected, especially in their reproductive years. MG is rare during pregnancy, with the first trimester and the postpartum period being the most common times for exacerbations. The influence of MG on pregnancy outcomes remains ambiguous, with some studies finding larger prevalence of issues such as preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age babies, while others indicate results similar to the general population. Management of MG during pregnancy necessitates careful monitoring and drug adjustments. Teratogenic concerns make several immunosuppressive drugs, such mycophenolate mofetil and methotrexate, contraindicated. In contrast, medications like prednisolone and pyridostigmine are generally recognized as safe. Women with MG may have flare-ups after giving birth, and infants may have transient neonatal myasthenia gravis. Comprehensive prenatal treatment and multidisciplinary assistance are crucial for promoting maternal and fetal health during pregnancy in women with MG. This paper examines the relevance of immunological biomarkers, RNAs, and other novel biomarkers in myasthenia gravis (MG). It emphasizes the need for more investigation to determine their role in the pathogenesis of MG, evaluate biomarker profiles across subgroups, and look at changes after treatment. The study also underlines the significance of high-throughput investigations to detect new biomarkers and reveal genetic variables impacting MG pathogenesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.