Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41897621›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Necrotizing (Abscessing) Lymphadenopathy and the Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS): A Review with Clinical Vignettes.

Christian Görg, Yi Dong, Görg Friedemann, Christian Jenssen, Michael Kallenbach, Kathleen Möller, Findeisen Hajo, Nitin Chaubal, Christoph Frank Dietrich

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christian GörgInterdisciplinary Center of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Clinical Infectiology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipp University of Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1900-5149
Yi DongDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200082, China.
Görg FriedemannInterdisciplinary Center of Ultrasound Diagnostics, Gastroenterology, Endocrinology, Metabolism and Clinical Infectiology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipp University of Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-0356-660X
Christian JenssenDepartment for Internal Medicine, Krankenhaus Märkisch Oderland, 15344 Strausberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7008-6650
Michael KallenbachKlinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0087-7748
Kathleen MöllerMedical Department I/Gastroenterology, SANA Hospital Lichtenberg, 10365 Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-9492-0141
Findeisen HajoDepartment for Hematology, Oncology and Immunology, University Hospital Giessen and Marburg, Philipp University of Marburg, 35037 Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0180-5452
Nitin ChaubalThane Ultrasound Centre, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 400026, India.
Christoph Frank DietrichUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe University Frankfurt on the Main, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6015-6347

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Necrotizing (abscessing) lymphadenopathy is a clinically relevant condition with a broad differential diagnosis, including acute bacterial infections, mycobacterial disease, zoonoses, fungal and parasitic infections, autoimmune disorders, and malignancies with central necrosis. Early and reliable differentiation between these causes is important to avoid misdiagnosis and to guide appropriate therapy. This review summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms, typical imaging features, and diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in necrotizing lymphadenopathy. Representative clinical vignettes illustrate the disease spectrum and correlate CEUS patterns with underlying pathology. The literature review was narrative and based on targeted searches of PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar focusing on CEUS in necrotizing lymphadenopathy. A brief literature overview highlights current evidence, limitations, and research gaps. Conventional B-mode ultrasound (BMUS) and Doppler typically demonstrate enlarged hypoechoic or heterogeneous nodes with reduced central vascularity but lack specificity for necrosis. CEUS provides real-time visualization of nodal microvascular perfusion, which may support clearer differentiation between viable tissue and necrotic or abscess cavities. Common but non-specific CEUS patterns include central non-enhancement with a peripheral hyperemic rim in abscesses, irregular avascular cores in tuberculous lymphadenopathy, patchy non-enhancing areas in autoimmune conditions, and heterogeneous enhancement with ill-defined necrosis in malignant nodes. CEUS can support biopsy targeting, facilitate drainage procedures, and enable radiation-free follow-up. CEUS may offer diagnostic and interventional advantages in the evaluation of necrotizing lymphadenopathy, offering more consistent characterization of nodal necrosis compared with conventional sonography. While most evidence focuses on tuberculosis and malignancy, growing experience with zoonotic and autoimmune diseases suggests broader utility. Most currently available evidence derives from observational studies and small case series, highlighting the need for prospective multicenter validation. Standardization of CEUS criteria, integration into multiparametric ultrasound protocols, and multicenter validation are needed to establish CEUS as a routine component in the diagnostic work-up of necrotizing lymphadenopathy.

Indexed as

abscessCEUScontrast-enhanced ultrasoundinfectionlymphadenopathymalignancynecrosis

Identifiers

PMID41897621
PMCPMC13025746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.