ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Beyond Computer-Aided Diagnosis: Artificial Intelligence as a "Digital Mentor" for POCUS Image Acquisition and Quality Assurance: A Narrative Review.
Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is portable and radiation-free, but its clinical reliability is constrained by operator-dependent image acquisition and the limited scalability of expert quality assurance (QA) review. As handheld devices proliferate faster than mentorship capacity, trainees increasingly rely on heterogeneous free open access medical education (FOAMed) resources that rarely provide real-time psychomotor feedback. We conducted a structured narrative review (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science; last searched on 23 February 2026), with searches performed by H.H. and independently checked by J.J.P. (both POCUS-trained clinicians). After screening, 31 studies were included. We synthesized evidence on artificial intelligence (AI) systems that support bedside image acquisition and automate QA. The primary synthesis centered on key prospective or comparative clinical evaluations of AI-guided acquisition across echocardiography, focused assessment with sonography in trauma, abdominal aortic aneurysm screening, and lung ultrasound, complemented by peer-reviewed studies of FOAMed appraisal tools and online resource quality. These evaluations suggest that real-time probe guidance, view recognition, anatomy labeling, and automated capture may enable novices, after brief training, to acquire diagnostically adequate images for narrowly defined tasks. Early reports of automated QA scoring and program-level triage for expert review suggest potential to reduce expert workload and shorten feedback cycles, but external validation, generalizability across devices and patient habitus, and patient-centered outcomes remain limited. Acquisition-focused AI may therefore serve as an upstream "digital mentor" to improve novice image acquisition. We propose a practical pathway that integrates curated FOAMed resources and simulation with AI-guided bedside acquisition and continuous QA governance for safe deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.