Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41897448›Full record

ReviewAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Impact of Antioxidant-Rich Whole Foods or Supplements on Skin Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical and Clinical Studies.

Yuxin Liang, Yujing Xu, Jung Eun Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuxin LiangDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0009-0000-9766-7298
Yujing XuDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.
Jung Eun KimDepartment of Food Science and Technology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117543, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-3912-9042

Funding

Bezos Earth Foundation A-8003360-14-00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntioxidant supplements have been reported to confer benefits for skin health; however, these effects remain inconclusive and lack systematic evaluation.

methodsThis systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the impact of antioxidant-rich whole foods or supplements on various skin health outcomes by compiling data from five databases, including 94 eligible preclinical and clinical studies.

resultsThe intervention improved overall skin health in preclinical studies, as evidenced by increased skin hydration (Hedges' g = 1.75, 95% CI [1.31; 2.20]) and hyaluronic acid, decreased trans-epidermal water loss (TEWL) (Hedges' g = -2.15, 95% CI [-3.17; -1.13]), epidermal thickness (Hedges' g = -2.59, 95% CI [-3.28; -1.89]), wrinkle formation, and dermatitis scores, alongside changes in inflammatory cytokines and Immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels. As for clinical studies, the intervention increased skin hydration (MD = 2.12, 95% CI [1.02; 3.21]) while decreased TEWL (MD = -0.68, 95% CI [-1.21; -0.16]). Additionally, changes in skin density, epidermal thickness, minimal erythema dose (MED), SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and the Dermatitis Life Quality Index (DLQI) further support overall improvements for skin health.

conclusionsAntioxidant-rich whole foods or supplements intake improved overall skin health and skin disorder conditions. The magnitude of benefit may vary according to the type of antioxidant and the duration of intervention.

Indexed as

acneatopic dermatitisdietary antioxidantoxidative stresspsoriasisskin aging

Identifiers

PMID41897448
PMCPMC13024200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.