Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41897415›Full record

ReviewBiomolecules2026

Effects of Naringenin in Preclinical Models of Breast Cancer.

Emily C Irwin, Newman Siu Kwan Sze, Evangelia Tsiani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emily C IrwinDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.
Newman Siu Kwan SzeDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5652-1687
Evangelia TsianiDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Applied Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4218-5851

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women, with approximately one in eight women developing the disease during their lifetime. Despite advancements in current treatment options, breast cancer was responsible for an estimated 670,000 deaths worldwide in 2022. This highlights the urgent need for the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Historically, plant-derived compounds have played a significant role in cancer therapy, exemplified by widely used chemotherapeutic agents such as paclitaxel and docetaxel. In recent years, increasing attention has been directed toward novel plant-derived compounds as potential anti-cancer agents. Among these, Naringenin, a flavonoid predominantly found in citrus fruits, has shown promising antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and anti-cancer properties. This review highlights recent studies investigating the effects of Naringenin and its derivatives on breast cancer. Evidence from both in vitro and in vivo animal models suggests that Naringenin may exert anti-tumor activity by inhibiting cell proliferation, promoting apoptosis, modulating key cell signaling pathways, and enhancing radio-sensitivity in breast cancer cells. Although preclinical evidence strongly supports the anticancer potential of Naringenin in breast cancer, comprehensive clinical studies are urgently needed to validate its efficacy and safety in humans.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsFlavanonesAnimalsApoptosisCell ProliferationFemaleHumansAntineoplastic AgentsFlavanonesnaringeninapoptosisbreast cancermetastasisnaringeninproliferation

Identifiers

PMID41897415
PMCPMC13024507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.