Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41897353›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2026

Complement Activation May Drive the Pathogenicity of Anti-α6 and Anti-β4 Integrin Antibodies In Vivo.

Gefei Du, Shirin Emtenani, Dennis Niese, Jian Liu, Ferdinand Gebauer, Neele J Dunst, Aysun Gökce, Kristina Spaniol, Florian Groeber-Becker, Jelena Šimunović and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Gefei DuLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Shirin EmtenaniLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7965-8045
Dennis NieseLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Jian LiuLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Ferdinand GebauerLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0009-0009-3768-1675
Neele J DunstLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Aysun GökceLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Kristina SpaniolDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Clinic Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Florian Groeber-BeckerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Clinic Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Jelena ŠimunovićGenos Glycoscience Research Laboratory, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-4229-3318
Mislav NovokmetGenos Glycoscience Research Laboratory, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Gerd GeerlingDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Clinic Düsseldorf, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2034-3687
Kyle T AmberDepartment of Dermatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Markus H HoffmannInstitute for Systemic Inflammation Research, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9698-9922
Ralf J LudwigLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Katja BieberLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3855-6683
Stephanie GoletzLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0355-4290
Gang ZhouState Key Laboratory of Oral & Maxillofacial Reconstruction and Regeneration, Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedicine Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Stomatology, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China.
Enno SchmidtLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.
Sabrina PatzeltLübeck Institute of Experimental Dermatology, University of Lübeck, 23562 Lübeck, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1172-3015

Funding

China Scholarship 563 Council and the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81000448China Scholarship Council program Project ID:202408320122Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRC1526 Pathomechanisms of Antibody-mediated AutoimmunityDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft CRU303 Pemphigoid DiseasesDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EM 565 362/1-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft EXC 2167/1, TI-3Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft RTG2633 Defining and Targeting Autoimmune Pre-DiseaseUniversity of Lübeck J13-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autoantibodies targeting α6β4 integrin have been identified in individual patients with mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP). Reactivity against α6 integrin has been associated with oral lesions, while anti-β4 integrin reactivity has been linked to ocular involvement. However, the pathogenic effects of these antibodies have not been fully elucidated. Here, we investigated the pathogenic potential of anti-α6 and anti-β4 integrin IgG both in vitro and in vivo. Immune complexes of anti-α6 and anti-β4 integrin induced the release of reactive oxygen species from normal human leukocytes and stimulated CXCL2 secretion in cultured murine C5N keratinocytes. In vivo, repeated injections of IgG against a recombinant fragment of β4 integrin into C57BL/6 mice led to palpebral conjunctival swelling and mild oral lesions. The latter was observed following injection of IgG against a recombinant fragment of α6 integrin. Histopathological analysis revealed subepithelial inflammatory infiltrates without evidence of split formation. Direct immunofluorescence microscopy showed linear deposits of IgG at the basement membrane zone in most tissues, whereas C3 deposition was largely absent. This lack of complement activation was corroborated by a complement fixation assay, which confirmed that IgG against α6 and β4 integrin failed to induce C3 deposition in normal murine conjunctivae, buccal mucosa, or skin. Collectively, these findings indicate that IgG autoantibodies against α6 and β4 integrin exhibit pathogenic activity in vitro and induce mild disease in vivo, possibly due in part to relatively inefficient complement activation in this model.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesComplement ActivationIntegrin alpha6Integrin beta4AnimalsHumansImmunoglobulin GKeratinocytesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLReactive Oxygen SpeciesAutoantibodiesImmunoglobulin GIntegrin alpha6Integrin beta4Reactive Oxygen SpeciesautoantibodycomplementCXCL2mouse modelmucous membrane pemphigoidα6/β4 integrin

Identifiers

PMID41897353
PMCPMC13024490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.