ArticleBiomolecules2026
The Small Molecule SR8278 Inhibits Cell Proliferation Independent of the REV-ERB Nuclear Receptor Proteins in Human Keratinocytes.
Article in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemical biology approaches to study and target circadian clocks and their components.FEBS letters · 2026Review
- Circadian control of immune homeostasis in cardiovascular health and disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The small molecule SR8278 was initially identified as an antagonist of the REV-ERB (reverse c-ERBAa) nuclear receptor proteins, which play important roles in metabolism and circadian rhythms. Though SR8278 has been shown to have beneficial physiological effects in a variety of different preclinical disease contexts, its impact on gene expression and cell proliferation in keratinocytes has not previously been examined. We therefore carried out an RNA-seq analysis and found that genes involved in the G1/S transition of the cell cycle were significantly impacted by SR8278 treatment, and these effects were confirmed at both the RNA and protein level by RT-qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. Cell proliferation assays showed that SR8278 slowed cell growth but did not induce genotoxic stress or apoptosis. Finally, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing and siRNA-mediated disruption of REV-ERB gene expression showed that the loss of the REV-ERB proteins did not impact the effect of SR8278 on gene expression and cell proliferation. We conclude that the anti-proliferative effects of SR8278 are not mediated by the REV-ERB proteins, and, thus, care should be taken when interpreting studies involving this compound unless complementary genetic approaches are also shown, particularly in studies involving cell proliferation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.