ReviewBiomolecules2026
Neurovascular Unit-Derived Extracellular Vesicles as Regulators of Post-Stroke Pathology and Neurorestoration.
Review in Biomolecules, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineered Exosomal miRNAs for Post-Stroke Neural Repair: Mechanisms, Delivery Strategies, and Translational Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of disability worldwide, marked by profound disruption of the neurovascular unit (NVU), a dynamic grouping of neurons, astrocytes, cerebral endothelial cells (CECs), microglia, pericytes, and oligodendrocytes. While acute stroke interventions such as tissue plasminogen activator and endovascular thrombectomy address reperfusion, they fail to engage the prolonged and cell-specific processes critical for recovery. Extracellular vesicles (EVs), membrane-bound carriers of proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids, have emerged as key modulators of intercellular communication within the NVU. This review synthesizes current evidence on NVU-derived EVs as both regulators and effectors of post-stroke pathology and repair. We highlight the phase-specific roles of EVs in modulating blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity, thrombosis, angiogenesis, neurogenesis, oligodendrogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and neuroinflammation. This review places special emphasis on how EV cargo reflects the state of their parent cells and how EV-mediated crosstalk orchestrates coordinated neurorestorative responses. We further discuss the dual nature of EVs, their therapeutic potential for stroke, and the methodological challenges impeding clinical translation, including isolation standardization, cell-specific targeting, and regulatory barriers. Thus, adherence to minimal information for studies of extracellular vesicles (MISEV) guidelines is essential to ensure rigor, reproducibility, and transparency. When combined with temporal and cellular specificity, NVU-derived EVs may represent a biomimetic platform for promoting durable recovery in stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.