ReviewHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Comparative Efficacy of Acupuncture Therapy in Primary Essential Tremor: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Review in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEssential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder that predominantly affects older adults, with rising global prevalence due to population aging. Pharmacological treatments, including propranolol and primidone, are often limited by inadequate efficacy or poor tolerability, and surgical options carry inherent risks. Acupuncture has shown promise as an alternative or adjunctive therapy for ET, but evidence comparing the effectiveness of different acupuncture modalities remains limited.
objectiveTo systematically evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of various acupuncture-related interventions for essential tremor (ET) through a network meta-analysis, and to provide evidence-based recommendations for clinical practice.
methodsWe systematically searched eight electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, Wanfang, and CBM) from inception to 20 October 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating any form of acupuncture therapy for ET were included. Conventional pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were performed to compare the efficacy (response rate, Tremor Six Score) and safety (adverse events) of different interventions. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values were used to rank treatment modalities.
resultsTwenty randomized controlled trials involving 1067 participants were included. Traditional meta-analysis indicated that acupuncture-related interventions significantly outperformed controls in improving response rate [RR 4.36, 95% CI (3.14, 6.03),
conclusionsThis network meta-analysis demonstrates that acupuncture-related interventions are effective and safe for treating essential tremor. However, caution is warranted in interpreting these findings due to methodological limitations in the included randomized controlled trials (small sample sizes, lack of blinding, inadequate allocation concealment), sparse data for some interventions, and the concentration of studies within China, which limits their generalizability. Despite these limitations, acupuncture offers a valuable non-pharmacological treatment option for patients with poor medication tolerance. Future large-scale, multicenter trials with rigorous designs are needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.