ArticleChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Patient and Family Perspective on Transition from Ventricular Access Device to Chest-Sited Port for Intracerebroventricular Infusion in CLN2 Disease.
Article in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Conversion of a ventricular rickham reservoir to a subcutaneous chest port for repeated intraventricular enzyme replacement therapy: technical note and surgical considerations.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerliponase alfa is currently the only approved disease-modifying therapy for neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis type 2 (CLN2) disease and requires lifelong intracerebroventricular (ICV) infusion, traditionally via a scalp-sited ventricular access device (VAD). Chest-sited port (chest port) for intracerebroventricular access using a tunneled central venous access device is described as an alternative, though data remain limited.
methodsWe present an anonymized caregiver narrative perspective describing two pediatric patients with CLN2 disease receiving cerliponase alfa infusions via different ICV access strategies: one patient who transitioned from a scalp-based ventricular access device to a chest port and one patient who initiated therapy with a chest port. A semi-structured caregiver interview was used to capture experiential insights related to decision-making, procedural burden, safety considerations, and psychosocial adaptation.
resultsThe caregiver identified key advantages of chest ports for ICV infusion, including durability of the device, enhanced securement, and smooth long-term routine integration. The transition from a scalp VAD to a chest port was described as proactive, well-coordinated, and associated with high caregiver satisfaction. Noted considerations included increased visibility of the access needle to the child, proximity to oral secretions, and potential misidentification of the port by emergency medical services. Families implemented mitigation strategies through labeling, education, and coordination with the care team.
conclusionsThis caregiver-centered case report highlights how access device choice meaningfully shapes treatment burden, safety planning, and daily life for families managing CLN2 disease. As chest-port methodologies become adopted, incorporating caregiver and patient perspectives is essential to developing patient-centered treatment options for long-term intracerebroventricular therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.