ReviewChildren (Basel, Switzerland)2026
Pre-, Pro-, Post- and Synbiotics in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.
Review in Children (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role of gut microbiota in paediatric short bowel syndrome.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric Short bowel syndrome (SBS) is the leading cause of intestinal failure and is characterized by persistent dysbiosis that negatively impacts intestinal adaptation and growth. Although microbiota modulation via pre-, pro-, and synbiotics represents a promising strategy, current evidence remains fragmented. This narrative review aims to critically assess the efficacy and safety of such interventions in the management of pediatric SBS.
methodsA structured literature search was conducted on PubMed up to November 2025. Fourteen relevant studies were included, comprising clinical trials, preclinical animal models, and significant case reports regarding the use of biotics in SBS.
resultsThe analysis reveals a microbiological dichotomy based on nutritional status: parenteral nutrition (PN)-dependent patients exhibit an excess of Proteobacteria associated with infectious risk, whereas weaned patients present a metabolic risk of D-lactic acidosis due to carbohydrate fermentation. Regarding efficacy, long-term synbiotic treatments (>12 months) demonstrated significant improvements in growth and nutritional status, likely mediated by increased production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and mucosal adaptation, unlike short-term probiotic cycles. However, serious adverse events (Lactobacillus sepsis and D-lactic acidosis) were reported, predominantly in patients with central venous catheters or malabsorption.
conclusionsBiotics offer therapeutic potential for intestinal failure, but their use cannot be empirical. The safety profile should be carefully selected, especially in central venous catheter (CVC) carriers. Future strategies must evolve towards precision medicine, prioritizing non-D-lactate-producing strains and personalized protocols based on the patient's nutritional phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.