ArticleBiomarker research2026
Proteome-based molecular subtyping and therapeutic target prediction in cervical cancer.
Article in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) represents a leading malignant threat to women’s health globally. Patients with advanced-stage CC frequently encounter limited therapeutic efficacy and prominent drug resistance, highlighting the urgent need for molecular-driven precision treatment strategies. Herein, we developed a proteomics-based molecular classification for CC. A total of 198 CC patients were classified into four distinct molecular subtypes: CC-I (n = 55), CC-II (n = 32), CC-III (n = 43), and CC-IV (n = 68). This classification system was further validated in an independent cohort, confirming its clinical reliability. Survival analysis indicated significant prognostic differences among the four subtypes (log-rank test, p < 0.001). Functional analysis revealed distinct molecular characteristics: CC-I and CC-IV were characterized by enrichment of immune-related pathways, while CC-II and CC-III displayed upregulated metabolism-associated pathways. Notably, CC-IV overexpressed pathways associated with cell cycle regulation, p53 signaling, and DNA repair, potentially contributing to its aggressive phenotype. Meanwhile, CC-I and CC-IV had higher immune scores and were enriched with T cells and B cells, suggesting potential favorable responsiveness to immunotherapies. Focusing on the CC-IV, we observed that high CDK4/6 expression was correlated with poor clinical outcomes. Patient-derived organoid (PDO) models confirmed that CDK4/6 inhibitor (palbociclib) had significant growth-inhibitory effects on CC patients with high CDK4/6 expression. In conclusion, this study established the first validated proteome-based molecular subtyping system for CC, and identified actionable therapeutic targets, and provided a robust foundation for personalized treatment strategies in CC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.