ArticleJournal of biological engineering2026
Beyond linearity: reimagining AI as a participant in circular bioeconomies.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As artificial intelligence transitions from industry-exclusive tool to public-facing technology, society faces critical decisions about its integration into socioecological systems. This paper proposes a reimagining of AI as a synthetic participant in the circular bioeconomy (CBE)-a regenerative model emphasizing cyclical flows of resources, information, and energy. Drawing on Bruno Latour's Actor-Network Theory and Donna Haraway's posthumanism, we reconceptualize AI as a non-living organism capable of functioning within multispecies systems, analogous to viruses that shape ecosystems without conventional life. Conventional, in that it meets the standard biological criteria for like: metabolism, reproduction, and homeostasis. AI, like viruses, does not meet this biological criteria. Current AI applications in CBE-from biowaste recycling to precision agriculture-demonstrate both transformative potential and ethical concerns. While AI enables unprecedented efficiency through advanced algorithms and embodied robotics, it risks perpetuating extractive logics that treat information as a resource to be mined rather than circulated. Critical ethical challenges emerge including algorithmic bias amplifying inequalities, epistemic opacity eroding stakeholder trust, blurred accountability for AI-driven harm, displacement of human labor, and marginalization of indigenous and local ecological knowledge. Through examples in medicine and remote sensing, we argue that AI becomes a "friend" to the Circular Bioeconomy (CBE) only when designed as circular and relational rather than linear and extractive. This requires synthetic datasets preserving privacy, multimodal architectures enabling dimensional understanding, and human-machine-ecosystem feedback loops replacing terminal outputs with ongoing accountability. Ultimately, AI's role depends on intentional design grounded in justice and multispecies dignity-transforming it from extractive tool into participant in shared regenerative futures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.