Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41896957›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2026

Woman-centred care in conflict-affected and fragile states: a scoping review of policy integration and implementation gaps in the greater horn of Africa.

Salma A E Ahmed, Angela Dawson, Chisato Masuda, Abela Mahimbo

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Salma A E AhmedSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia. Salma.Ahmed@uts.edu.au.
Angela DawsonSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0926-2202
Chisato MasudaProgramme Division, United Nations Population Fund, Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights Branch, New York, USA.
Abela MahimboSchool of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2058-6881

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWoman-centred care (WCC) is a respectful approach and a key component of quality care that prioritises a woman's dignity, autonomy, and preferences during pregnancy, birth, and postpartum. Health policies and guidance documents underpinned by such principles are essential to shaping high-quality healthcare that prevents adverse outcomes, saves lives, and makes pregnancy and childbirth positive experiences, regardless of humanitarian settings. We sought to identify how WCC is incorporated into national intrapartum care policies, plans, and service guidelines in conflict-affected and fragile states in the Greater Horn of Africa.

methodsWe systematically searched for policy, plans and guidance documents focusing on maternal health and intrapartum care in Sudan, South Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia and Eritrea published between 2000 and 2025. A directed qualitative content analysis approach was used to analyse 42 documents, organised into six core WCC principles.

findingsOf the 42 documents reviewed, 17 national policies, 7 plans, and 18 technical guidelines, most were issued by government health ministries. Explicit reference to “woman-centred care” was rare, with related terms like patient-centred and respectful maternity care appearing more frequently after 2016. Three main patterns of WCC integration emerged: systematic, fragmented, and profession-specific. Ethiopia has incorporated a respectful maternity care framework into policy and training since 2016, with ongoing audits but limited accountability. Sudanese documents (2008–2027) support patient-centred care but lack clear guidance on implementation and monitoring. South Sudanese documents reference client-centred values in policy, though implementation guidance is inconsistent. In Somalia, WCC is addressed mainly in midwifery strategies, while broader plans seldom mention it, and monitoring frameworks are unclear.

conclusionNational health policies and guidance documents in the Greater Horn of Africa increasingly acknowledge WCC principles, though explicit use of the term “woman-centred care” is rare. Accountability mechanisms, resource allocation, and monitoring frameworks for WCC are notably lacking, except partially in Ethiopia. Addressing implementation challenges such as accountability, resource allocation, and monitoring is critical for advancing WCC and improving maternal health outcomes in crisis contexts. Integrating WCC principles across the reproductive health continuum, including adolescent health and postnatal care, is necessary for comprehensive quality improvement.

Indexed as

Armed ConflictsHealth PolicyMaternal Health ServicesPatient-Centered CareEthiopiaEvidence GapsFemaleHumansPregnancySudan

Identifiers

PMID41896957
PMCPMC13147577

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.