ArticleBMC health services research2026
Quality and readability of Turkish online patient information websites on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveBenign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) is the most common peripheral vestibular disorder. Many patients search the internet for information about their symptoms and treatment options; however, the quality and readability of online patient education materials may vary considerably. To evaluate the quality and readability of Turkish-language online patient information on benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV) and assess differences by website source.
methodsSeventy Turkish-language websites on BPPV were identified via Google and Yandex on March 1, 2025, using predefined criteria, and were categorized into private hospitals/medical centers, individual health professionals, and general/non-profit websites. Quality was assessed with the DISCERN instrument, and readability was measured using the Ateşman and Bezirci–Yılmaz formulas.
resultsOverall quality was poor (mean DISCERN score: 36.79 ± 11.59), with most sites rated “poor” or “fair.” Websites from individual health professionals scored higher than general/non-profit websites (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed between hospitals/medical centers and the other groups. Readability was “moderately difficult” across all groups, with no significant differences (p > 0.05). Quality and readability were not correlated (p > 0.05).
conclusionTurkish BPPV websites were generally low-quality and moderately difficult to read. Improving clarity, accuracy, and accessibility may help enhance patient understanding and support more informed decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.