ReviewParticle and fibre toxicology2026
Small particles, large questions: unravelling the toxicity and potential health risks of PET micro-/nanoplastics.
Review in Particle and fibre toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the extensive use of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), the public health implications of its micro- and nanoparticles (MNPs) remain poorly understood, raising credible concerns about human exposure and health risks. We conducted a comprehensive literature search to synthesise evidence on human exposure to PET MNPs, their detection in human tissues and biological fluids, and the human-relevant toxicity of PET particles in vitro and in vivo. Studies consistently identify PET MNPs across consumer and environmental sources, and several investigations have detected PET in human matrices, supporting the plausibility of systemic translocation across biological barriers. Toxicological findings consistently indicate size- and shape-dependent uptake and effects: smaller particles exhibit greater cellular internalisation, reactivity, and biodistribution, with predominant oxidative, inflammatory, metabolic, and genotoxic responses, whereas larger microplastics more often provoke mechanical irritation. Key gaps include limited protocol harmonisation, unrealistic exposure levels, scarce long-term/kinetic data, and insufficiently standardised, well-characterised PET MNPs preparations. While evidence for exposure, detection in human matrices, and biological activity is growing, these deficits still hinder robust cross-study comparisons and clinically meaningful quantitative risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.