Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41896858›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026

Automated knee MRI segmentation with KneeSeg-U for cartilage and bone extraction using an unsupervised deep learning framework.

P P Fathimathul Rajeena, Mona Abdelbaset Sadek Ali, Nora Al Khaldi, R Sunder, P P Rahoof, Umesh Kumar Lilhore, Sarita Simaiya, Ehab Seif Ghith, Shimaa A Hussien, Lidia Gosy Tekeste

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

P P Fathimathul RajeenaComputer Science Department, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Mona Abdelbaset Sadek AliComputer Science Department, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
Nora Al KhaldiComputer Science Department, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 31982, Saudi Arabia.
R SunderSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, UP, India.
P P RahoofDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering (Cybersecurity), Malabar Institute of Technology (MIT), Anjarakandy Integrated Campus, Kannur, Kerala, 670612, India.
Umesh Kumar LilhoreSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, UP, India. umeshlilhore@gmail.com.
Sarita SimaiyaSchool of Computer Applications and Technology, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, UP, India.
Ehab Seif GhithDepartment of Mechatronics, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Shimaa A HussienElectrical Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh, 11671, Saudi Arabia.
Lidia Gosy TekesteEritrea Institute of Technology, Mai-Nefhi College, Himbrti, Mai Nefhi, Abardae, Eritrea. lidiagosytekeste@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The segmentation of knee cartilage and bone in magnetic resonance images with supervised learning methods needs manual annotations from experts, although it demands high amounts of labeled data. KneeSeg-U presents itself as a deep learning unsupervised framework that extracts cartilage segments and bone structures from knee MR imaging automatically with unmarked scan data. KneeSeg-U provides automated full-system segmentation with precise results through unaided clinical efficacy and by negating the requirement for expert annotations. The creation of our extensive knee MRI dataset involved obtaining various sequences from both open-access repositories and clinical points of origin. During training, we applied domain-specific enhancement approaches along with contrastive learning algorithms to build better generalization abilities. The U-Net architecture applied in KneeSeg-U remains trainable through adversarial methods that incorporate self-supervised learning features with consistency restrictions for achieving precise segmentations. Experimental tests demonstrate KneeSeg-U produces segmentations that match supervised methods through a cartilage Dice similarity measure of 0.87, even as bone Dice similarity reaches 0.91 above typical unsupervised segmentation methodology. The system shows generalization functionality for different MRI protocols and multiple anatomical patterns. The KneeSeg-U framework represents an effective method to automate MRI knee segmentation without needing annotated references for building adaptable methods in clinical research about musculoskeletal disease diagnosis.

Indexed as

Cartilage, ArticularDeep LearningKnee JointMagnetic Resonance ImagingUnsupervised Machine LearningHumansDeep learningKnee MRImedical image segmentationMusculoskeletal imagingUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID41896858
PMCPMC13147798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.