ArticleBMC oral health2026
Can experiential learning boost dental ergonomics? evaluating a microscope-based curriculum through Kirkpatrick's model.
Article in BMC oral health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMusculoskeletal disorders are a major occupational health issue for dental professionals. Traditional ergonomics training is ineffective for achieving mastery of its principles. This study evaluated the effectiveness of the experiential ergonomics course incorporating dental operating microscopes, using Kirkpatrick’s levels 1 and 2.
methodsThis study conducted a pretest-posttest study with a single group of 103 second-year dental undergraduates from Wuhan University, who completed an experiential ergonomic learning program. The course was designed based on Kolb’s cycle, using dental operating microscope as a key tool. Participants completed researcher-developed pre- and post-course questionnaires featuring 5-point Likert scales, multiple-choice, and binary-response items to assess changes in knowledge, attitudes, and satisfaction. Practical skills were evaluated using the Dental Ergonomics Assessment (DEA) rubric. Data were analyzed using paired-sample t-tests, one-sample t-tests, McNemar’s test, and Spearman’s correlation, with a significance level of p < 0.05.
resultsOf the 103 enrolled students, 89 completed matched pre- and post-course assessments. The curriculum led to significant improvements in students’ ergonomic knowledge (p < 0.001) and their attitudes toward the importance of ergonomics for pain prevention. Post-course ergonomic performance was favorable (overall DEA score: 1.45), and this objective performance showed a strong negative correlation with the belief in ergonomics’ effectiveness (r = -0.624, p < 0.001). Participant feedback was exceptionally positive, with 100% satisfaction regarding course content.
conclusionsThe microscope-based experiential learning course improved dental students’ ergonomic knowledge, attitudes, and postural performance. The strong correlation between competency and conviction supports the view that this approach effectively synchronizes theory with practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.