ArticleBMC ophthalmology2026
A comparative study on the influence of age-specific ocular anatomical differences on the prediction of post-ICL surgery vault.
Article in BMC ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo evaluate the impact of age-related ocular anatomical changes on the accuracy of postoperative vault prediction following implantable collamer lens (ICL) surgery and to identify key predictors for vault change (ΔVault).
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 2107 eyes that underwent ICL implantation (model V4c). Machine learning algorithms, including Light Gradient Boosting Machine, XGBoost, Support Vector Regression, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree, were used to construct two prediction models: a full-age cohort model (18–50 years, n = 2107) and a young cohort model (< 40 years, n = 1788). Furthermore, 426 eyes were stratified into three age-based groups for anatomical and dynamic vault analysis: Young group (18–30 years, n = 188), Middle-aged group (31–39 years, n = 134), and Older group (≥ 40 years, n = 104). The preoperative parameters were measured using ultrasound biomicroscopy. Model performance was evaluated using the root mean square error (RMSE), coefficient of determination (R²), mean absolute error, and mean square error. Anatomical parameters and dynamic postoperative vault changes were compared across the age groups.
resultsThe prediction accuracy of the young cohort model (< 40 years) was significantly superior to that of the full-age cohort model (RMSE: 53.59 μm vs. 64.36 μm; R²: 0.896 vs. 0.881; P < 0.01). Anatomical analysis revealed a significant stepwise increase in lens thickness (LT) from the Young to the Older group (3.5131 ± 0.1962 mm, 3.5860 ± 0.2784 mm, 3.9212 ± 0.2470 mm, P < 0.001), whereas anterior chamber depth (ACD) progressively decreased (3.2662 ± 0.2877 mm, 3.1067 ± 0.1958 mm, 3.0440 ± 0.2317 mm, P < 0.001). The variability of ΔVault, defined as the difference between vault at 6 months postoperatively and vault at 1 day postoperatively, was greatest in the Older group (standard deviation = 122.55 μm), intermediate in the Middle-aged group (111.61 μm), and smallest in the Young group (67.62 μm). Feature importance analysis for ΔVault identified ciliary process length, maximum ciliary body thickness, and LT as the top three predictors.
conclusionThe inclusion of patients aged 40 years and older significantly reduces the performance of a universal vault prediction model. Older patients exhibit distinct ocular anatomical characteristics, including increased LT, altered ciliary body parameters, and poorer postoperative vault stability. These findings suggest the need to develop age-specific prediction models that incorporate dynamic anatomical factors to optimize surgical planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.