ArticleBMC pediatrics2026
Pediatric orbital masses from a tertiary pediatric oncology referral center: clinical characteristics and survival outcomes from a 20-year single-center experience.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric orbital masses are uncommon and most reports originate from ophthalmology services, where benign lesions predominate; oncology-referral populations may differ and remain underreported.
methodsWe reviewed children evaluated for proptosis and orbital mass at a tertiary pediatric oncology unit (2000–2020). Demographic features, diagnostic spectrum, tumor origin, age distribution, diagnostic approach, and survival outcomes were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan–Meier analysis and compared by log-rank testing. Prespecified exploratory comparisons included age (< 5 vs. ≥ 5 years), diagnostic approach, and metastatic neuroblastoma versus other malignant orbital tumors. A univariable Cox model explored the association between metastatic neuroblastoma and OS.
resultsSixty patients were included (65% male), with median age of 4.74 years (IQR, 2.16–8.84 years). Malignant tumors comprised 88% (n = 53); benign lesions were 12% (n = 7) and mainly vascular. The most frequent diagnoses were metastatic neuroblastoma and optic pathway glioma (each 21.7%), followed by non-Hodgkin lymphoma and rhabdomyosarcoma (each 13.3%). Histopathology confirmed 85% (n = 51), whereas 15% (n = 9) were diagnosed radiologically, predominantly optic pathway gliomas. Diagnosis differed by age (< 5 vs. ≥ 5 years; p = 0.009), with metastatic neuroblastoma concentrated in children younger than 5 years (92.3%). Nine deaths occurred, all in malignant tumors. Metastatic neuroblastoma was associated with inferior overall survival and higher mortality risk than other orbital tumors.
conclusionsPediatric orbital masses referred to oncology centers represent a high-risk population with a high malignancy rate. Rapidly progressive proptosis, particularly in children < 5 years, should prompt urgent evaluation for metastatic neuroblastoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.